For Reviewers
How to Write a Constructive Peer Review
ScholaRevs Editorial
3 min read
Constructive peer review is a craft. It requires judgment, discipline, and a structure that makes the review easier for editors and authors to use.
Start with the editorial question
Before writing line-level comments, identify the main decision-relevant issues. What must the editor know? What must the authors address for the work to be reliable, clearer, or more complete?
Use a layered structure
Begin with a short summary, then list major concerns, then minor comments. This makes the review easier to scan and prevents small edits from obscuring substantial scientific questions.
Write comments that can be acted on
A constructive comment names the issue, explains why it matters, and suggests what kind of clarification, analysis, or revision would address it. Not every problem has an obvious solution, but every comment should be understandable.
Peer Review
What Makes a Good Peer Review?
A practical guide to the habits that make peer review useful to editors, authors, and the scientific record.
For Reviewers
How to Write a Constructive Peer Review
A clear structure researchers can use when reviewing manuscripts for journals.
For Reviewers
Common Mistakes Reviewers Make
Frequent review problems that reduce clarity, fairness, or usefulness.