SCHOLAREVS

SCHOLAREVS

From reviewer interest to professional recognition

From reviewer interest to professional recognition

From reviewer interest to professional recognition

The public workflow is intentionally simple: researchers apply, ScholaRevs reviews submitted information, expertise is organized, and approved reviewers may continue profile work in the portal.

The public workflow is intentionally simple: researchers apply, ScholaRevs reviews submitted information, expertise is organized, and approved reviewers may continue profile work in the portal.

1. Apply

Researchers express interest through the existing reviewer application.

2. Complete profile

  1. Apply

Reviewers provide fields, methods expertise, academic profiles, availability, and relevant experience.

Researchers express interest through the existing reviewer application.

2. Complete profile

Reviewers provide fields, methods expertise, academic profiles, availability, and relevant experience.

3. Verification and fit

  1. Apply

ScholaRevs evaluates credentials and fit before activating reviewers for future opportunities.

Researchers express interest through the existing reviewer application.

ScholaRevs evaluates credentials and fit before activating reviewers for future opportunities.

3. Verification and fit

ScholaRevs evaluates credentials and fit before activating reviewers for future opportunities.

4. Review and reputation

Completed work and editor feedback are intended to support long-term reviewer reputation and quality improvement.

Completed work and editor feedback are intended to support long-term reviewer reputation and quality improvement.

Two sides of the ecosystem

Two sides of the ecosystem

The reviewer pathway is active through the application and profile experience. The journal/editor side is communicated as platform direction unless explicitly available.

The reviewer pathway is active through the application and profile experience. The journal/editor side is communicated as platform direction unless explicitly available.

Reviewer pathway

Researcher → application → reviewer profile → future peer-review participation.

Editor pathway

Editorial need → reviewer expertise context → better recruitment decisions → stronger reviewer pool over time.

Shared outcome

More dependable reviewer discovery and a clearer professional record for peer-review work.

More dependable reviewer discovery and a clearer professional record for peer-review work.

Boundary

ScholaRevs supports reviewer infrastructure; it does not replace journal editorial decisions.

CURRENT WORKFLOW

CURRENT WORKFLOW

The public journey is deliberately simple

The public journey is deliberately simple

Researchers apply through the public website. ScholaRevs reviews submitted expertise information. Approved reviewers can continue profile-related work in the existing portal.

Researchers apply through the public website. ScholaRevs reviews submitted expertise information. Approved reviewers can continue profile-related work in the existing portal.

Public site

Explains ScholaRevs, the reviewer pathway, and the editor-facing value proposition.

Application

Collects academic background, research expertise, profile links, review experience, and availability.

Portal

Provides the separate authenticated space for invited reviewers to continue profile and onboarding work.